|A still from “Tulip Fever,” a beautiful film with some very very historically accurate 1630s costuming.|
Oh boy, am I torn on Costume College Gala plans for 2019. I really want to do something 17th century, but I have so many choices!
I secretly love almost all of the 17th century. Fashion and aesthetic changed quite drastically, so there is a lot to explore in those 100 years. I’m drawn to the 1660s (I made one gown a long time ago and loved it) and have some materials and a plan already for a gold duchesse satin gown….but I also love the 1630s, particularly Dutch fashion, and I also have some of the materials for my own rendition.
|One of the clearest images I’ve found in my 1630s rabbit hole depicting vital details of the gown, bodice, and petticoat along with accessories and silhouette. Rijksmuseum, 1619-1623|
I’m currently (that is, today at this minute) most drawn to the Dutch early 1630s for two reasons. One is that one of my besties gave me some imperial yellow silk for Christmas; the other is that Patterns of Fashion 5 has exactly the bodice (smooth covered stays) in it that I could not find resources for last year when I became interested in these gowns. Additionally, I have a ridiculous amount of near-black silk taffeta that’s been marinating for several years and I took Constance Mackenzie’s Elizabethan Ruffs class at Costume College. AND I saw a good number of these gowns in portraits at the Louvre this Fall, so……….ok, I guess that’s actually five reasons.
Five reasons to make a gown is four reasons more than I really need. So I’ll take this as an imperative from the Universe.
|Frans Hals painted many portraits of noblewomen in this type of dress. Here is a detail from one such portrait.|
Looking over the Patterns of Fashion 5 pages, the construction of the most showstopping piece, the smooth-covered stays, doesn’t look that complex. There are only three pieces – back, front, and skirt – with boning in the front only, and pad stitching in the back shoulders and the skirt. There is a lot of handwork there, but I may take some shortcuts, like working falsie buttonholes for non-functional buttons, and possibly purchasing ready-made replica buttons from The Tudor Tailor instead of covering 30-some odd wooden molds with thread.
|This bodice is in Patterns of Fashion 5 and also the Abegg-Stiftung book, the latter of which has several more examples. Early 1630s.|
In addition to the lobster-tail smooth-covered stays, the ensemble needs a set of sleeves (matching the stays in brightass yellow and black), the gown itself, a petticoat, cuffs, the mother of all ruffs with a rabatto or picadil, jewelry (possibly a girdle), and the cap. I thankfully already have a shift, stockings, shoes, and a gigantic bum roll, but I may also need other or different skirt supports and a purpose-made underpetticoat.
|Another of the bodices from the Abegg-Stiftung book, this one a little earlier and with matching sleeves, which weren’t always present. The book notes that sleeves often matched the bodice, but were tied into the armscyes of the overgowns rather than always stitched to the under bodice. More on all that later…|
In preparation for this project I went through the very complex, long, and confusing process orf hunting down a vital publication – Kölner Patrizier- und Bürgerkleidung des 17. Jahrhunderts Die Kostümsammlung Hüpsch im Hessischen Landesmuseum Darmstadt (Cologne patrician and citizen clothing of the 17th century The costume collection Hüpsch in the Hessian State Museum Darmstadt) from the Abegg-Stiftung website. This book is in German, but comes with an English translation of the first three chapters. It’s full of detailed descriptions (most of which I can’t read, lol – I’ll find a way!) of many 17th century garments including the smooth-covered stays from Patterns of Fashion5, and partial surviving gown worn over. Despite the book being very expensive, difficult to purchase online (wire transfer?), not in my language, and slow in shipping from Switzerland (came in a bag?), it is an incredible tome of focused costume study from a period for which there are very few resources. I’m happy to have it!
|This is the book is amazing.|
I’m very excited for this project. I love weird and wonderful periods of dress, especially the ones that are least loved by the historical costuming world. I like the challenge of trying to get it portrait-right and learning the why’s and how’s along the way.
Catherine D GibsonMay 16, 2022 at 12:09 PM
I’m looking for evidence of what an English colonist in the Carolinas would be wearing. My ancestors came to Carolina from England in 1636 and were well to do planters. Unlike other planters, they did actually relocate. We’d like to participate in Historical/DAR events in appropriate costumes, but, finding reference images is proving a challenge. Any ideas. They weren’t puritans or anything like that.
Lauren @ American DuchessMay 16, 2022 at 12:23 PM
Sounds so cool! Take a look at what the working class was wearing in 17th century England. The fashions weren’t different between the colonies and England at that time. There are barely any surviving 17th century clothing of any class, so check out paintings, prints, and portraits. There are a couple 17th century pattern books – “Seventeenth Century Women’s Dress Patterns” (2 books), “Patterns of Fashion 3,” and “The Tudor Tailor.” Most clothing used the same pattern shapes just in different materials, so do not be dissuaded by something that looks too fancy – make it in earth-toned wool and it’ll be perfect for planters and working people.
ClusterFrockNovember 3, 2022 at 8:31 AM
I’m not sure if it’s the same thing as the book, but Johannes Pietsch did his dissertation on the Hüpsch collection, and it’s available for free online. It’s amazing, full of patterns, descriptions of the layers and construction, diagrams of the stitches used, the fabric weaves, it has literally everything. It’s in German, but it’s an amazing resource!
Lauren @ American DuchessNovember 3, 2022 at 10:32 AM
oh my goodness thank you SO MUCH!!!