Those of you who follow me on Facebook will know I’ve been asking around about stockings. What material, what color you like, etc. Some more questions are to come, but first, let’s look at some gorgeous extant stockings from years gone by.
|
Bata Shoe Museum |
When I say “stockings,” I don’t mean 20th century nylons, but instead the lovely leg-confections of the past. I find it ironic that ladies wore such colorful and exciting legwear when most of the time their legs were never seen, and in some periods the glimpse of an ankle was taboo. Yet the decorations are always on the ankles! What teases those ladies of the past must have been!
Men wore fanciful stockings too, though, and some of these I will show you are for men, and some for ladies. See if you can guess which are which. 🙂
|
MFA Boston, 1650-1750 |
Stockings were made of many things – silk and wool were most common – and worn by all levels of society. All of these stockings came up over the knee and were tied with garters.
|
Colonial Williamsburg, 1750 |
|
MFA 1750-1800 |
|
The Met – late 18th century |
You will notice the decorations on the sides of each stocking. These were known as “clocks,” and could be embroidered on, or woven in, to the stocking. Also remember that all stockings had seams on the backs of the legs. The construction is very different that we find on modern socks.
|
The Met – 19th century |
|
The Met – early 19th century |
These were just from 17th, 18th, and early 19th centuries – I’ll save the cool Victorian stockings for a later post – but I hope you have found some inspiration in them. I mean, how awesome are these stockings! For the upper classes (of which these all are, of course), it shows that you can be quite creative with your stockings, in you next 18th century or Regency gown. It was so much more varied than your expected white or ivory!
Like this:
Like Loading...
10 Comments
Alexa
May 28, 2012 at 5:43 PMThose Regency stockings are crazy! Especially the pair from 1795-99. That's some serious frippery 🙂 (Or foppery!)
Lauren R
May 29, 2012 at 9:06 PMinorite! /drool
StephC
May 29, 2012 at 12:39 AMIf only I could find stockings like these to wear now…
Ingrid Mida
May 29, 2012 at 1:04 AMI saw these stockings at the Bata Shoe Museum…. So lovely.
Lauren R
May 29, 2012 at 9:06 PMsomeday I will make a special trip to Canada JUST to go to Bata. It's a need!
Lizzardtears
May 29, 2012 at 1:22 AMwow those are cool. I really never thought about how different the stockings would have been. the shapes are so interesting. not anything like what we find today. it couldn’t have been that comfortable to have seams like that on your feet.
Lauren R
May 29, 2012 at 9:07 PMI imagine people of the past to be more tolerant of foot pain than we are today. Just take straight-lasted shoes, for instance! Add to that weird seams on stockings!
Charlotte
May 29, 2012 at 9:20 AMThose are so awesome! And thanks for clearing something up for me – I'd always imagined that the line in Gilbert & Sullivan's "Love Unrequited" (from Iolanthe) "in your shirt and your socks – the black silk with gold clocks" referred to actual clocks, now I know better (though in fact I still quite like the idea of socks embroidered with gold clocks!).
xx Charlotte
Tuppence Ha'penny Vintage
Lauren R
May 29, 2012 at 9:07 PMAh yes! It was a pun in the 18th century too! There is a great cartoon depicting a stocking maker sheepishly asking if the clock tax applied to clocked stockings too. (it didn't, lol)
Jenn-TheFadedDiary.com
June 3, 2012 at 3:01 AMGreat post! I would love some of these in my wardrobe! 🙂