I watched a fascinating show last night, BBC ‘Horizon: The Secret Life of the Dog,’ and got to thinking about dogs of the past, and what is a “period correct” dog. I think this is a question that pops up in every dog-owning costumer’s mind, at some point, when considering if his or her dog could attend faires and events…I suppose as a costume “prop?” I know I’ve thought about it…
So what are some dogs we’d see in the 18th century?
Hunting Dogs
A small spaniel, maybe a Brittany
An English Spaniel or a Springer Spaniel, a hunting scene by Gainsborough
A hound, although looks a bit like a spaniel, with those ears.
A hound – a pack of these would have been used to run down this stag.
Foxhounds, by George StubbsCompanion Dogs
The white pomeranian seems to show up quite a lot in Gainsborough’s work
Here they are again…
This is Fino, the Prince of Wales’ pomeranian.
Other breeds such as poodles and pugs were popular then as they are today, but some looked significantly different. Marie Antoinette’s “Mops” we all know as the fat little pug from the 2006 movie, likely looked more like this…
We are familiar with other toy breeds from the 18th c., such as Cavalier King Charles Spaniels, Bichon Frise, Pappilons, and various terriers (this last being a group of dogs that were bred for specific hunting, but became the pets of the aristocracy)
George Stubbs’ portrait of a Spanish dog belonging to Mr. Cosway, 1775, my best guess is Pappilon
Queen Charlotte, with what looks like a King Charles’ Spaniel
A delighful painting by Fragonard (if not a little voyeuristic?). Not sure of the breed, but looks like some kind of poodle?
Another interesting painting by Fragonard, the woman with an odd costume (maybe for theater?), with her lapdog, possibly a pappilon
Dalmatian, with the carriage in the background.
A Newfoundland, by Stubbs
For thousands of years dogs have been our companions and assistants. It’s fascinating to see them appear in portraits, next to famous 18th c. figures, or all on their own. They were as beloved and essential to the people of the 18th c. as they are to us today (perhaps moreso), and ought not to be overlooked when we think back on and study this time in history.
13 Comments
Anna Cotton
February 17, 2010 at 8:39 PMThe American Kennel Club akc.org and Dog Breed Info Center dogbreedinfo.com have information about breeds and origins. Usually the Dog Breed Info Center has more information about origins etc.
AnnaJ
February 17, 2010 at 9:26 PMI've always wanted a Cavalier King Charles Spaniel.
Abby
February 17, 2010 at 9:33 PMThose big Pomeranians look like american eskimo dogs or Skipperkies (sp?) not tiny, not large and furry furry furry! 🙂
Cool post!!
Oh and thanks for the shout out with the video!! 🙂 🙂 🙂
Olympe de la Tour D'Auvergne
February 17, 2010 at 10:49 PMWhat an appropo post considering our last discussion. Reinette and I have enjoyed all the dog portraits posted here. Oddly enough the Cavaliers (like her) were bred in the modern era to look like the spaniels in the portraits because the original breed had died out.
Lauren R
February 17, 2010 at 11:51 PMAnna, you're totally right, and dog origins are super fascinating – there are so many breeds in Europe we don't have in the USA.
Abby, I agree, they do look very much like samoyeds and American Eskimos. NOW looks at them – they kindof resemble ewoks nowadays, haha (but I won't lie, I secretly adore poms)
Comtesse, yes it was totally a combination of the show I watched and the bit we shared about Reinette that got me thinking. My grandmother had a King Charles, and they always seemed like the perfect little aristocratic dogs 🙂
As for me, well, my dog is not at all historically accurate unless I were dressed as a Mongol or Asian princess, which, uh, wouldn't exactly work with my, uh, features 🙂
Finegan Antiques
February 18, 2010 at 4:03 AMBeautiful paintings and beautiful dogs. I wonder how the artist got the dogs to sit and behave for the length of time required to capture their image? But what about the 18th century cat? Surely they weren't relegated to the barn for a life of catching mice.
Donna
Robin Gallowglas
February 18, 2010 at 5:19 AMI used to love to bring my Greyhound to events with me. She always looked so elegant. I wish I had gotten a portrait of her with me in garb before she passed away…
Lauren Stowell
February 18, 2010 at 7:17 AMFinegan – I did find one portrait in my searchings that had a cat in it, so I'm sure they were for pets as well! (perhaps it is your calling to do a post on 18th c. cats?)
Robin, I can't help but love sighthounds (Avi being of that same general shape). I could do a sketch of you two, if you like, if I have photos of the both of you (don't have to be together).
Miss Kodee
February 18, 2010 at 3:12 PMI think the second dog painting is a Cavalier King Charles Spaniel not a Brittany. Great history information!
Duchess
February 18, 2010 at 5:57 PMMiss K, it does look just like one. All the description said was that it's a "spaniel" by stubbs, and the Comtesse in her comment above mentions that modern Cavaliers were bred in modern times because the original breed had died out. I wonder if they were similar to the pomeranian and pug in that they looked rather different? I do agree, though, it does look spot-for-spot like a King Charles.
JiminSF
May 24, 2012 at 11:16 PMThe dog in the Gainsborough painting looks like an Irish red and white setter. This was the original Irish setter, from which red Irish setters were bred. They are frequently depicted in 18th Century hunting/pastoral scenes, often paired with a Gordon setter.
buy backlinks
September 6, 2017 at 12:24 PMThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
lucy taylor
September 5, 2020 at 10:28 AMExcellent blog, good to see someone is posting quality information. Thanks for sharing this useful information. Keep up the good work.
Top 10 Dog Breeds of 2020