As promised, here is my really big post of pattern notes and adjustments for Simplicity S8941 1790s to Regency Round Gown and Open Robe pattern.
This pattern was originally designed in the 1790s style, with a peaked back and full gathered skirt. As is Simplicity’s preference, it was designed to be worn with a modern bra, but can also be worn with a 1790s or Regency corset.
This period of dress is an “easy” one to pattern because there is no tricky waist fitting – BUT, there is still the bust, sleeves, and overall length to consider. So let’s get into how to make these adjustments, along with a few others. I’ve made some handy diagrams –
The biggest check and adjustment many report for Simplicity S8941 is the bust depth for the round gown. Though 1790s necklines were *very* low, the amount of decolletage you wish to show will depend on your bust size as well as personal and design preference. For my 1790s Vigee Lebrun round gown I wanted a higher neckline, so I made the above adjustment for a look closer to the original portrait.
The next adjustment was for skirt length. Simplicity patterns are sized for about 5’3″ to 5’4″, the average height of an American female (apparently.). I am 5’6″ so I needed to add on, plus I wanted an epic train. It’s an easy fix, shown above.
Above is one design adjustment and one pattern fix. The design adjustment is to straighten out the back if you don’t like the 1790s peak. Not all ’90s gowns had that peak and later Regency gowns lost it as well. I will admit that it’s a pain to keep a sash in place (I added thread loops to the center back on mine), and much easier to keep it tied with a straight back.
Lastly, for those of us with narrow shoulders, here’s a multi-staged adjustment. This one works best for when you are fitting shoulder straps and sleeves on the body, in the 18th century method (see The American Duchess Guide to 18th Century Beauty for step-by-step instruction with photos). It’s important to add shoulder strap length as well as extra to the sleeve head to accommodate for setting the shoulder straps further back.
13 Comments
Anonymous
January 9, 2021 at 8:39 PMoh no, look at that, suddenly i have started a new project, how did that happen?? jokes aside, i absolutely love how much extra help you guys provide with your patterns! you're the bomb 😀
Lauren Stowell
February 16, 2021 at 1:07 AMGlad to be of service! (and an enabler 😉 )
Karen Holt
February 12, 2023 at 5:11 AMAm tracing and cutting pattern pieces for this gown and suddenly notice:
According to info on back of packaging envelope my 108cm (= 42.5″) bust requires pattern size 20. But printed on the bodice pattern PIECES is (size) 20 – 44.5″ – 113 cm and (size) 18 – 42.5″ – 108cm. There’s definitely a mistake there somewhere, and I’m assuming it’s on the outer envelope, as the European dress size associated with 18 is also what I wear.
Mrs Irena
March 25, 2021 at 11:26 PMI made a mock up of your open robe bodice in blue and white stripes . I will posted it on Historical Costuming blog ….please let me knwo IF it looks about right. I slight tightnees in front at arm pits and I did cut a crescent shape out to allow for more movenet . Maybe I needed to cut more ??? Irena
admin
May 16, 2021 at 5:57 AMHi! I can’t wait to see your make! Can you tell me where you posted your photos?
DAC
March 27, 2021 at 8:25 PMIf my bust measurement is 35 inches, and under bust 29 inches (both measured over chemise and Regency stays), should I use size 10 or 12?
Also, are the skirt panels narrower than your original design?
I hope to cut and sew these lovely garments on my summer break.
Appreciate your reply.
Lauren @ American Duchess
May 16, 2021 at 6:56 AMHi! I would go with the larger size *just in case* and then fit out the excess. For the skirt panels, no, they aren’t narrower. The skirt is very full all the way around.
Joni
June 30, 2021 at 2:51 PMI’m using your adjustment for more bust coverage, but I’m a little confused. If I add 1″-2″ at the shoulder on the front piece, isn’t that going to make the armscye considerably larger as well? How will the sleeve fit if I do that? Thanks!
Maudelynn
July 12, 2022 at 8:32 PMHello! I love the fit of the bodice, the shoulders are perfect. I just want the gown to not be so low in the front. Can I just add the extra to the bodice front but not the shoulder?
Thanks
Lauren @ American Duchess
July 20, 2022 at 11:07 AMYes, you can just re-draw the neckline top edge to be higher and it should still work without changing the shoulder <3
Karen Holt
February 12, 2023 at 5:21 AMP.S. to my comment (see below for repeat) about the sizing issue. The info listed on the bodice pattern pieces I mentioned is ONLY listed on the Under Bodice Front pattern piece. It’s listed under the heading “Finished Garment Measurements.
Original comment:
Am tracing and cutting pattern pieces for this gown and suddenly notice:
According to info on back of packaging envelope my 108cm (= 42.5″) bust requires pattern size 20. But printed on the bodice pattern PIECES is (size) 20 – 44.5″ – 113 cm and (size) 18 – 42.5” – 108cm. There’s definitely a mistake there somewhere, and I’m assuming it’s on the outer envelope, as the European dress size associated with 18 is also what I wear.
Lauren @ American Duchess
February 28, 2023 at 12:31 PMThe discrepancy between the pattern envelope and the pattern tissue print is a known thing with Simplicity patterns (and other commercial patterns). It’s because they have a standard graphic they use for the back of the envelope but the finished garment measurements, printed on the specific pattern, factor in the ease. Always go by the finished garment measurements printed on the tissue. Yes, it’s frustrating and ridiculous and makes it really hard to buy the right pattern packet if you’re between sizes. As a general “rule” Simplicity adds a lot of ease to everything, so you will most likely end up cutting and making a smaller size number than expected. No idea why Simplicity continues to do things this way.
F
October 31, 2023 at 1:41 PMDear Lauren / Abby,
i bought this pattern, but was wondering about the position of the sleeve in the back.
the back bodice is a normal width, compared to period gowns, which have a narrow back, with accomodating sleeves pointing more to the back.
when did the narrow bodice back came (back) in fashion? and was the sleeve/shoulder in the 1790s around its natural position?
thank you in advance.
Kind regards